In this problem you are to estimate the parameters of two, real, ergodic noise processes
based upon information from their estimated autocorrelation function φ[k] and/or
estimated power spectral density S(Ω). In the following:
μ is the mean value of the random process;
σ is the standard deviation of the random process;
N is the number of samples of the random process;
φ0 = E{ φ[k = 0] } is the expected value of
the autocorrelation function at k = 0 as computed from
the signal sample, and;
S0 = E{ S[Ω = 0] } is the expected value of the power
spectral density at Ω = 0 as computed from the signal sample.
The key is to develop two expressions f and g that will enable us to estimate
the relevant parameters.
Find an expression based upon E{ φ[k] } that relates μ, σ, N,
and φ0 in the form φ0 = f(μ, σ,
N).
Find an expression based upon E{ S[Ω] } that relates μ, σ,
N, S0, and φ0 in the form
S0 = g(μ, σ, N, φ0).
Note that these two expressions f and g are independent of the distribution
being studied so long as μ and σ exist and are finite.
The two processes we will analyze are a) an exponential distribution for the amplitude
at each time sample leading to a random signal e[n] and b) a Poisson distribution
at each time sample leading to a random signal P[n].
We begin with a second sample of an
exponentially-distributed random process whose probability density
function p(x|α) = p(x) = αe–αx where α > 0 and
x ≥ 0. The single parameter α is randomly chosen from the set
{0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4, 12.8, 25.6}. Each time you perform this exercise by
pressing the “retry” button below ()
another sample of the process will be generated but with a new, probably different value
for the parameter α of the random process.
Using the expression f, N, and the measured value
φ0 estimate the value of α that was used
to generate this sample. Call this estimate αf.
Using the expression g, N, and the measured value S0 as well
as the measured φ0 estimate the value of α that
was used to generate this sample. Call this estimate
αg.
By what percentage do αf and αg
differ from each other? By what percentage do they differ from the true value
α?
Can you think of a reason why we might have intentionally suppressed the
display of the labels on the vertical axis of the signal e(t)?