In this problem you are to estimate a parameter of a
second sample of an ergodic noise process b[n] based upon information from the
autocorrelation function φbb [k] and/or the power spectral density
Sbb(Ω).
The process is similar to the one that produced b[n] in
Laboratory Exercise 6.1c but now
the random variable has value +1 with probability p and value 0 with probability
1–p. Let us call this “unfair” binary noise. (Why the term “unfair”?)
Each time you perform this exercise by pressing the “retry” button below
()
another sample of the process will be generated but with a new, probably different
value for p. The value of p will be chosen randomly from the set
{0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9}. You will notice that no estimate of the
probability density function is presented. You can use the “Zoom” slider to examine the
details of the various graphs.
Based upon the data shown in the bottom row, is it reasonable to conclude that
b[n], an “unfair” binary process, is a sample of a white noise process?
Explain your reasoning.
Based upon N and the autocorrelation φbb [k=0],
estimate the value of p that was used to generate this sample. Call this
estimate p1
Based upon N and the power spectral density Sbb(Ω=0)
as well as φbb [k=0], estimate the value of p that
was used to generate this sample. Call this estimate p2
It should be clear what the true value of p is for each experiment, each time
another value for p is randomly chosen from the set given above. By what
percentage do p1 and p2 differ from
p? From each other?